CFP – Harry Potter Studies

Document Icon

Call for Papers
Harry Potter Studies
40th Annual Conference of the Southwest Popular/American Culture Association
Feb 20-23, 2019
Hyatt Regency Hotel & Conference Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico

SWPACA invites scholars to submit papers to the vibrant and diverse Harry Potter Studies Area of the Southwest PCA/ACA conference. The Harry Potter Studies Area is an interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary field that focuses on both the novel and filmic versions of J.K. Rowling’s work. Papers may address the work as a whole, specific characters, themes, relationships, social and/or cultural implications, individual texts within the series, etc.

Paper and/or panel proposals are welcomed. Any and all types of scholars, including independent scholars, graduate students, non-tenured, tenure-track, tenured and emeritus faculty are encouraged to submit. The Harry Potter Studies Area aims to emphasize a diversity of scholarship opportunities and is open to innovation in approach to research about the Potterverse. Networking among Potter scholars with an eye toward post-conference collaboration and publication is a key goal of the Harry Potter Studies Area.

Papers from the Harry Potter Studies Area presented at conferences since 2012 have been gathered into four (4) published, edited volumes released in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, with two more volumes scheduled to be released in 2019. We are an area committed to publication!

Papers submitted to the Harry Potter Studies Area are eligible for the SWPACA Travel Fellowships and the Richard Tuerk “Out of This World” Paper Award for Science Fiction and Fantasy. Dual submissions to the Area and the awards are highly encouraged. For application information, see http://southwestpca.org/conference/graduate-student-awards/.

Please consider submitting to the official SWPACA journal, entitled Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy. For more information, please visit http://journaldialogue.org.

For individual paper proposals, please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words to the official SWPACA database at http://conference.southwestpca.org/southwestpca/. Please also include a biographical note about each author in lieu of a full CV.

For panel proposals, please feel free to send an initial query email, or to propose the panel directly. Please include all of the information requested for an individual paper proposal for each member of the panel, as well as a working title for the panel and an additional description of no more than 300 words explaining the purpose/theme of the panel.

Please submit all questions to Dr. Christopher Bell (cbell3@uccs.edu), chair of the Harry Potter Studies Area. All proposals must be submitted to the database by November 1, 2018. Proposals sent to the chair via email will be returned and you will be asked to submit via the database. Information on the SWPACA and the conference can be accessed at http://southwestpca.org/.

CFP – Female Authors of Modernist Children’s Literature in Central Europe

Document Icon

Call for Chapters
Female Authors of Modernist Children’s Literature in Central Europe
Editors: Milena Mileva Blazić (University of Ljubljana), Yevheniia Kanchura (Zhytomyr State Technological University), and Alicja Fidowicz (Jagiellonian University)

Modernism was a cultural period that brought a lot of changes in society, art, and literature. Scientific and social progress, new ideas in psychology and pedagogy, emancipation of women, and other significant changes had a large influence on all literature, including children’s literature. Our project is to look at modernism in children’s literature of Central Europe, which was a multicultural region with different types of literary works.

We invite papers including the following topics:

  • Modernist tendencies in the writings of female authors from Austria, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine (years 1880-1930)
  • Beginnings of new trends in children’s literature created by female authors at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th
  • Biographical contexts of writings for children created by female authors
  • Reception of female authors’ writings in modernist Central Europe
  • Writings of women from national and religious minorities (Jewish, Muslim, Protestant…)
  • Contemporary reception of modernist female children’s authors

Please send your papers to: modernist.female2018@gmail.com by 1 July 2019. Before sending your paper, please contact us for editorial information.

CFP – Media, Technology and New Generations: Representing Millennial Generation and Generation Z

Document Icon

CFP: Media, Technology and New Generations: Representing Millennial Generation and Generation Z
Editors: Ahmet Atay (College of Wooster) and Mary Z. Ashlock (University of Louisville)

Even though the millennial generation, and now Generation Z, are two of the most educated and technologically savvy generations in U.S. history, compared with other generations, how they are, particularly millennials, are depicted in the media has not been widely studied (see, among others, Rose Kundanis and Paula Poindexter). For example, unlike previous generations, millennials are widely criticized for being self-centered, lacking curiosity and involvement in politics, mindlessly following cultural and fashion trends, and being victims of the consumer culture, as perpetuated by media outlets. We argue that while millennials are technologically savvy, capable of using different electronic devices and digital platforms, they often do not critically examine either the social and economic impact of these technologies or the ways they are individually affected by them. Furthermore, we argue that they do not critically examine the political and cultural implications of their heavy media and technology usage and how various cultural groups are represented in mediated texts. As a result, they often lack critical media analysis techniques to evaluate their media usage and the messages embedded in mediated texts. These characteristics of millennials are often depicted in various television shows, films, and news, and other aspect of popular culture, advertising and fashion. Therefore, the ways in which millennials are represented in media can determine how they are perceived by the previous generations. These representations can also shape the nature of the future generations, because millennials can function as role models for them. Therefore, studying these representations is crucial. Similarly, as technological “natives,” members of the Generation Z are also born into digital (and consumer) culture where most of their experiences, including education, dating, and shopping are digitalized.

Hence, the main goal of this book is to examine millennials and the members of Generation Z in the context of media and visual culture. In order to do so, we have to consider three interrelated areas: the ways millennials and Generation Z are presented in media, media and popular culture forms products designed for these two generations, and also media and popular culture forms products designed by millennials. The examination of millennial generation and Generation Z and their cultures would be incomplete without understanding these areas.

This book has several interrelated goals:

  1. Examining representations of millennial generation and Generation Z in media and visual culture.
  2. Examining media and visual culture texts produced by the members of the Generation Z and millennial generation.
  3. Theorizing media in the context of millennial culture and Generation Z.
  4. Bridging the gap between media and youth/generations studies by looking at mediated representation of the millennial culture as well as the culture of Generation Z.
  5. Taking a cultural studies perspective to explore the mediated and visual aspects of the millennial culture and the culture of Generation Z.

Topics may include but not limited to:

  1. Millennial and Generation Z generations and the role and issues of new media
  2. Different ways of understanding the mediated millennial culture and Generation Z whose members are culturally diverse and complicated
  3. Media and films about Generation Z and millennials
  4. Media and films about Generation Z and millennials
  5. Digitalization of millennials and Generation Z
  6. The political economy of generations
  7. Culturally diverse mediated and digitalized millennial and Generation Z experiences

Abstracts are due by November 20, 2018, with a word length of no more than 500 words, along with pertinent references, contact information, and a short biographic blurb of 300 words. Full-length manuscripts are due on March 15, 2019, with a word length of no more than 5,000-7,000 words and in APA style, including references, endnotes, and so forth. The project is currently under contract with Lexington Books. Please mail your abstracts as Word documents to Ahmet Atay (aatay@wooster.edu) for an initial review.

CFP – Special Issue of Dzieciństwo: Literatura i Kultura: Film and TV Series Adaptations of Children’s and Youth Literature in the 21st Century

CFP - DLK Film and TV Series Adaptations

Film and TV Series Adaptations of Children’s and Youth Literature in the 21st Century

Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, we have been observing the increase in the popularity of film and TV series adaptations of children’s and youth literature. It was in 2001 that such productions were made as Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone by Chris Columbus – screen adaptation of the first part of the famous J. K. Rowling’s heptalogy, The Princess Diaries by Gary Marshall based on the Meg Cabot book, or Shrek by Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson inspired by a book by William Steig under the same title.

We would also like to devote the first issue of the journal Dzieciństwo: Literatura i Kultura to consideration on the 21st century trend of adaptation of children’s literature – both film and TV series, presented on cinema and television screens and on streaming platforms (such as Netflix). What are the transformations of childhood constructs relative to literary prototypes? What tendencies are visible in film and TV series adaptations understood as reinterpretations of pre-text books? What literary works are the modern adapters most willing to use and what could be the reasons for their choices? Who is the hypothetical recipient of contemporary film and TV series adaptations?

We invite you to look at contemporary adaptations of both the classics of literature for young audiences and newer works; Polish and foreign texts. When presenting the analyzes of films and TV series, we would like to remind of their often forgotten – for example under the influence of adaptation – literary prototypes. We are interested in case studies as well as cross-sectional studies.

The problem areas we propose are:

  • Adaptations of multi-volume novels – both complete (e.g. Harry Potter, Hunger Games), and incomplete (e.g. His Dark Materials, Eragon, The Chronicles of Narnia, Percy Jackson); here especially the hypothetical reasons for the lack of continuation
  • New adaptations of the classics against previous adaptations (e.g. The Jungle Book from 2016 versus The Jungle Book from 1967)
  • Adaptations of contemporary fantasy literature (e.g. A Monster Calls, Coraline) and literary realism (e.g. Wonder, The Fault in Our Stars)
  • TV series adaptations of the era of streaming platforms (e.g. Anne, Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events)
  • Adaptations of the latest Polish children’s and youth literature – film (e.g. Za niebieskimi drzwiami, Felix, Net i Nika oraz teoretycznie możliwa katastrofa) and TV series (e.g. Kacperiada, Pamiętnik Florki)
  • Adaptations more popular than their book source material (e.g. Shrek, How to Train Your Dragon)
  • Expansion of the source material (e.g. Where the Wild Things Are, Le Petit Prince – are those still adaptations?)
  • Biographical films about the creators of children’s and youth literature (e.g. Finding Neverland, Saving Mr. Banks, Goodbye Christopher Robin) and their relationship with the phenomenon of adaptation

We also invite you to send texts that are not related to the theme of the issue to the Varia and Reviews sections.

The deadline for submitting articles: November 30, 2018

Website: http://www.journals.polon.uw.edu.pl/index.php/dlk
Email: redakcja.dlk@uw.edu.pl

CFP – Postmodern Writing, Artistic Orientation and Literary Tradition: Studies on Tonke Dragt’s Children’s Books and Their Media Adaptations

Document Icon

Call for Papers

From 30 September to 2 October 2019, The University of Siegen organizes in cooperation with Tilburg University a conference on “Postmodern Writing, Artistic Orientation and Literary Tradition. Studies on Tonke Dragt’s Children’s Books and Their Media Adaptations.”

For more than 50 years Tonke Dragt has been one of the most popular children’s authors in the Netherlands. In Germany, her two best-known books Der Brief für den König (A Letter to the King) and Das Geheimnis des siebten Weges (The Song of Seven) have become bestsellers. Time and time again, these two together with some of her further children’s books have been adapted to other media, such as films, audiobooks, and games. At the moment, Netflix is planning to adapt A Letter to the King into a TV series. Dragt’s novels have also been adapted for educational purposes.

While Dragt’s novels enjoy a tremendous popularity, her work has been widely neglected in academia. Both intermedial and interdisciplinary approaches to her work as well as specific literary-theoretical and historical perspectives on Dragt’s oeuvre are still a rare occurrence in the academic landscape. This conference aims at changing this situation and wants to provide a good foundation for future research.

Together with authors such as Paul Biegel, Otfried Preuβler, Michael Ende, and James Krüss, Tonke Dragt belongs to a generation of children’s book authors who did not follow the 1970s trend of realistic, problem-oriented children’s literature. Instead, they created adventurous and fantastic worlds in their literary texts, which addressed fundamental existentialist questions. In the same vein as the above mentioned authors, Dragt gains her inspiration from folk- and fairy tales, as well as from classic world literatures. Riddled with well-known quotations and references from these literatures, Dragt’s stories invite young readers to go on a literary treasure hunt. This postmodern aspect of her work, reminiscent of Michael Ende’s books, also offers new perspectives on German literatures of this time period. Particularly interesting for children’s literature research are also both her illustrations and the collages she orchestrates of her own work as well as those of other authors.

Contributions in German, English or Dutch could address, but are not restricted to the following topics:

  • Biographical aspects
  • Tonke Dragt’s position in Dutch children’s literature
  • Genres in Dragt’s oeuvre
  • Analysis of Dragt’s books from critical perspectives such as ecocriticism, postcolonialism, comparative literature, narratology and translation studies
  • Interdisciplinary studies of Dragt’s illustrations of her own work and that of others
  • Media adaptations of Dragt’s work (film, television, audiobooks, games)
  • Adaptations of Dragt’s books for educational purposes
  • Dragt’s books in the discussion about the difference between popularity and canonicity

Abstracts (ca. 300 words) and a short academic biography should be sent before 30 November 2018 to the organizing committee: Dr. Jana Mikota, Siegen University, email: Mikota@germanistik.uni-siegen.de; Erik Dietrich, Siegen University, email: erik-dietrich@gmx.de; Prof.dr. Helma van Lierop-Debrauwer, Tilburg University, email: h.vanlierop@tilburguniversity.edu.

Travel expenses will be reimbursed provided that we get third-party funding for the conference. On the occasion of the author’s ninetieth birthday, we expect to publish a book with conference papers in the series Kinder- und Jugendliteratur intermedial (scheduled for 2020).

CFP – Special Issue of Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens: “Dear Child”: Talking to Children in Victorian and Edwardian Children’s Books

Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens logo

“Dear Child”: Talking to Children in Victorian and Edwardian Children’s Books
To be published in Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens 92 (autumn 2020)
https://journals.openedition.org/cve/

The 92nd issue of the French peer-reviewed journal Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens (CVE) will address the question of communicating with children in Victorian and Edwardian children’s books.

Like the many (adult) novels analyzed by Stewart in Dear Reader: The Conscripted Audience of Nineteenth-Century Fiction, nineteenth-century children’s books are particularly aware of their audience. Yet if Stewart scrutinizes the prototypical address “Dear reader” that, he feels, is the symbol of “the relentless micromanagement of response in nineteenth-century narrative” (21), he does not see that address and its variations as instrumental in constructing a conversational tone. Children’s books, on the other hand, with their prototypical address, “Dear child” (rather than “Dear reader”), seem to rely on, and create conversations between the implied author and/or narrator and the implied reader and/or narratee, in keeping with the tone that Chambers (1978) says is usual for children’s books, “the tone of a friendly adult storyteller” (5).

Children’s books entertain a specific relationship with their audience. They are often said to be the product of conversations: as Grenby (2009) reminds us, children’s authors of all time have indeed frequently insisted that the books that they published grew from private conversations with children they knew. This is famously the case of 19th-century authors such as Lewis Carroll (who improvised some episodes of Alice’s Adventures under Ground, which then served as a basis for Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, while rowing a boat with Lorina, Alice and Edith Liddell), J. M. Barrie (who entertained the Llewelyn Davies boys with tales of a boy who would not grow up and later published Peter Pan) and Kenneth Grahame (who told his son Alastair stories he subsequently developed for The Wind in the Willows). Many other children’s authors specify in the prefaces or dedications to their books that the stories they tell originated from conversations with children (for instance, Catherine Sinclair in Holiday House, Mary Molesworth in Four Winds Farm, or Rudyard Kipling in Just So Stories). As Grenby puts it (2006: 17), such assertions about the conversational geneses of children’s books endow child readers “with a flattering agency in the creation and conservation of stories,” and consequently may aim to incite child readers to actively respond to stories, and not merely receive them passively, becoming, in effect, participants in the conversation. Various strategies may be used to trigger responses: the narrator may address the child reader, or ask direct questions to him/her; the author may also leave what Iser (1972) and Chambers (1978) after him call “gaps” in order to “challenge the child reader to participate in making meaning of the book” (Chambers 10).

Conversing with children while elaborating stories may also alter the way children are depicted in children’s books, as well as the place and role of conversations with children in children’s books. For instance, as Gubar (2009) and Iché (2015) have shown, Alice is frequently talked to in the Alice books and is recurrently portrayed as an active collaborator in the meaning-making or even storytelling process. Though not explicitly endorsing the myth of the domestic origins of their books, some children’s authors, namely Dinah Craik, Juliana Horatia Ewing, Mary Louisa Molesworth and Edith Nesbit, who probably “had the chance to observe children’s development at close[…] range,” also decided to “help the young find their own voices” (Gubar 2009, 127). One way of giving pride of place to children is to show the role of children in shaping stories (see Rosing’s analysis of Ida’s role in Juliana Horatia Ewing’s Mrs. Overtheway’s Remembrances) or to employ child narrators (as in Ewing’s Six to Sixteen or in Nesbit’s The Story of the Treasure Seekers). Are the voices of these child narrators and child characters markedly dissimilar from the voices of adult narrators and child characters as portrayed by adult narrators? How thematically and stylistically different are the conversations led by these child figures?

Rose (1984), Nodelman (1992) and many other scholars have highlighted though the power imbalance between adult authors and child readers, with adult authors constructing children as other in order to constrain them and their reactions. Gubar, though deconstructing this vision of children as disabled and non-agential (2013), argues in Artful Dodgers that this is, in effect, one of the lessons of Stevenson’s Treasure Island, in which a manipulative storyteller circumscribes Jim’s actions under the guise of celebrating his power. Iché (2015) similarly argues that the Alice books (and in particular The Nursery Alice) give the impression of eliciting the implied child reader’s participation in the conversational construction of the story, while actually controlling his or her every reaction. Child narrators, who are but the product of (more or less) hidden adults (see Nodelman’s The Hidden Adult 2008), may also prove to be cunning manipulators, who engage in mock-two-way-conversations with the narratee in order to shape his or her mind—in keeping with the didactic origins of children’s literature.

This issue will thus examine the question of how children are talked to, and consequently ascribed a specific place and role in the conversation. Attention can be paid to characters, whether they are children or child stand-ins, narratees, implied and real-life readers. Venues of inquiry for this issue include (but are not limited to):

  • the conversational geneses of 19th-century children’s books and their impact on the narrative structures and/or the role of the child reader
  • the role and place of conversations with children in 19th-century children’s books
  • the conversational relationship between child or adult narrators and child narratees
  • the narrative and stylistic strategies to enhance / restrain child agency
  • adult-led conversations and children’s responses
  • the issue of child narrators

Please send abstracts (no longer than 400 words) with a short bio-bibliographical notice (no longer than 50 words) by January 10, 2019, to Virginie Iché (Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, France): virginie.iche@univ-montp3.fr.

Notifications of acceptance will be sent by February 15, 2019. Full articles will be due by June 20, 2019. Proposals in English or French will be considered.

Selective Bibliography

Beauvais, Clémentine. “What’s in “the Gap”? A Glance Down the Central Concept of Picturebook Theory.” Nordic Journal of ChildLit Aesthetics 6 (2015): 1-8.
Chambers, Aidan. “The Reader in the Book: Notes from Work in Progress.” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 1978: 1-19.
Grenby, M. O. “The Origins of Children’s Literature.” The Cambridge Companion to Children’s Literature. M. O. Grenby and Andrea Immel (eds.). Cambridge: CUP, 2009: 3-18.
Gubar, Marah. Artful Dodgers: Reconceiving the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
—. “Risky Business: Talking about Children in Children’s Literature Criticism.” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 38.4 (Winter 2013): 450-457.
Iché, Virginie. L’esthétique du jeu dans les Alice de Lewis Carroll. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2015.
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1974 [1972].
—. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
Knowles, Murray and Kirsten Malmjær. Language and Control in Children’s Literature. London: Routledge, 1996.
Nodelman, Perry. “The Other: Orientalism, Colonialism, and Children’s Literature.” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 17 (1992): 29–35.
—. The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. Baltimore: The John Hopkins UP, 2008.
Prince, Gerald. “Introduction to the Study of the Narratee.” Reader-Response Criticism. Jane P. Tompkins (ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980: 7-25.
Rose, Jacqueline. The Case of Peter Pan, or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Houndmills and London: Macmillan Press, 1994 [1984].
Rosing, Meghan. “‘Stories by Bits’: The Serial Family in Juliana Horatia Ewing’s Mrs. Overtheway’s Remembrances.” Victorian Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal Of Victorian Studies 39.2 (2013): 147-162.
Stewart, Garrett. Dear Reader: The Conscripted Audience in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1996.
Wall, Barbara. The Narrator’s Voice: The Dilemma of Children’s Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.
Watson, Victor. “The Possibilities of Children’s Fiction.” After Alice: Exploring Children’s Literature. Morag Styles, Eve Bearne and Victor Watson (eds.). London: Cassell, 1992.

CFP – Rethinking Child and Youth Marginalities: Movements, Narratives, and Exchanges

Document Icon

Call for Papers
Rethinking Child and Youth Marginalities: Movements, Narratives, and Exchanges
Anthropology of Childhood and Youth Interest Group (ACYIG) Biennial Conference
March 7-9, 2019
Rutgers University—Camden, NJ

Co-Sponsored by: AAA Anthropology of Children and Youth Interest Group, Department of Childhood Studies (Rutgers-Camden), Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice (Rutgers-Camden), and The Graduate School (Rutgers-Camden)

In a world centered on adults, “childhood” as a social category is marginal. Such marginality makes complex tracks on child and youth bodies, psyches, relationships, and spaces. Existing research on children and youth has expanded our understanding beyond a binary and static reading of their lives by framing the multiple sources of marginality as active sociocultural processes that are embedded in—but are not overdetermined by—enduring effects like structural violence, capitalism, racism, homophobia, and nationalism. This scholarship compels us to pay attention to the movements, narratives, and exchanges that mark these processes of making, breaking, and negotiating marginalities. This conference aims to rethink child and youth marginalities in generative and creative ways that situate young people at the center, and that resist their dehumanization, whether through criminalization or romanticization.

The questions that this conference seeks to explore include, but are not limited to, the following: What are the different ways in which children and youth experience marginalization? To what extent do young people identify and engage with categories produced by the state and civil society around their marginalization? How critical is biological age to the construction of marginality, particularly given the tendency to fetishize the “neglected” child while pathologizing the “juvenile”? How does increased state surveillance along with reduced social protection affect the kin and domestic households of children and youth, including their roles and relationships in these domains? How do global efforts to improve the lives of marginal children represent marginality as an ahistorical and universal condition? How do youth create counter-narratives within projects of improvement directed by the state and civil society? By documenting the tensions between young people’s economic and social precarity and their desire for a more equitable future, how does scholarship and advocacy on or with marginal youth reconceptualize marginalities?

This conference seeks to bring together emerging and established scholars and practitioners across the fields of anthropology, sociology, geography, education, urban studies, and social work to understand, rethink, and transform child and youth marginalities. In addition, we will consider conference submissions on a full range of themes connected to the anthropology of children and childhood.

Aimee Meredith Cox, Associate Professor in Anthropology and African American Studies at Yale University (https://anthropology.yale.edu/people/aimee-meredith-cox), will give our keynote address. Dr. Cox’s award-winning book, Shapeshifters: Black Girls and the Choreography of Citizenship (Duke University Press, 2015) explores how Black girls in a Detroit homeless shelter develop creative strategies through performance, protest, and the politics of respectability that resist the binds of poverty, racism, and sexual & gendered violence. Their narratives speak to broad conditions of deindustrialization and urban change and reclaim Black life in the urban United States.

Although participants are welcome to submit panel proposals, the conference organizers will also be forming panels from individually-submitted papers based on the categories below. If you would like to be considered for inclusion on one of these panels, please clearly indicate the categories on your submission. You may suggest more than one category:

  1. Methodology
  2. Violence
  3. Illness and (Dis)ability
  4. Schooling and Skilling Youth
  5. Youth Movements
  6. Race and Ethnicity
  7. Labor and Work
  8. Gender and Sexuality

Submissions may be made in the following formats:

  1. Individual Volunteered Paper: Individual paper presentations are 15 minutes long and will be grouped into organized sessions of related papers.
  2. Panel Session: A panel is a group of papers (no more than 4) submitted jointly for a single session. In addition to individual paper abstracts, submission materials must include a panel title, abstract, session chair, and discussant (optional; in addition to the four paper presenters). Panel sessions are 90 minutes in length.
  3. Roundtables: Roundtables raise a significant question to be discussed by multiple panelists, and offer unique opportunities for learning and exchange. In lieu of individual abstracts, roundtable proposals should include a single abstract identifying the targeted questions that panelists will address, and the names and affiliations of panelists. Proposals for roundtables should include at least 4 panelists. Roundtables are 90 minutes in length.
  4. Workshops: A workshop typically utilizes a structured, didactic format in which the organizer is a specialist and participants attend to learn the specialty. Workshops should be offered free of charge. Submissions should include the abstract, a short biography of the workshop leader, and any specific technology or space requirements. Workshops may be 90 minutes.
  5. Performance/Other Presentation: We welcome innovative presentations (performance art, visual presentation, short-film, meet-the-author session, etc.) that relate to the conference theme. If you would like to propose a session in this format, provide a summary of the performance/presentation and any specific technology or space requirements. Performances are 90 minutes in length. To discuss other possibilities, please email: ACYIG2019.aaa@gmail.com.

All submissions should include:

  • author/organizer name(s) and affiliation(s);
  • title;
  • 500-word abstract;
  • three key words;
  • the conference theme(s) (one or more, if any) which this submission addresses; and
  • space or A/V needs.

Submissions should be emailed to ACYIG2019.aaa@gmail.com by Monday, December 3, 2018 by 5 p.m. EST.

CFP – Youngsters 2: On the Cultures of Children and Youth

ARCYP Logo

CALL FOR PAPERS — Youngsters 2: On the Cultures of Children and Youth
The Association for Research in the Cultures of Young People
May 9-12, 2019
Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

Deadline for paper, panel, and roundtable proposals: October 12, 2018

The Association for Research in the Cultures of Young People invites proposals for our second Youngsters conference in the field of children’s and youth studies. While scholars have been producing exciting work in the field for decades, that work has found itself positioned most often under the umbrella of other fields, including children’s literature, sociology, and education, media, or cultural studies. This conference seeks to draw together scholars from these diverse fields to showcase and discuss the astonishing breadth of interdisciplinary scholarship in children’s and youth studies.

We welcome approaches to the study of childhood and children’s and youth cultures from an array of disciplines, fields, and historical periods, including work deploying a wide range of methodologies and theoretical approaches. We strongly encourage dynamic and innovative proposals for papers, panels, roundtables, workshops, or other formats.

Themes and topics may include:

  • The Racialization of Childhood
  • Childhood, Borders & (Im)mobilities
  • The Geographies of Children and Youth
  • Indigenous Youth Media
  • Two-spirit, and non-binary/gender fluid/creative childhoods
  • Queer and trans childhood and 2SLGBTQIA+ youth cultures
  • Futurity and queer temporalities of childhood
  • Child’s Play
  • Youth activism
  • Youth Subcultures and Scenes
  • Cross-disciplinary methodologies of Child and Youth Studies
  • Archiving children and youth
  • Institutional childhoods
  • Sex-Education & the Child
  • Critical disability studies and youth studies
  • Remediated and Transmedia Childhoods
  • Ecologies of Youth
  • Queer parenting and families
  • Criminal Youth and Child Perpetrators
  • Animated Childhoods
  • Young people and sports history
  • Dance, theatre arts, and childhood cultures
  • Digital media and early childhood education
  • Youth Fan Cultures
  • The Limits and Possibilities of Children’s Rights
  • Childhood and Cultures of Risk
  • Baby Cultures
  • Parenting and surveillance
  • The Sartorial Child
  • Utopian/Dystopian Youth
  • The Child in Ecocriticism
  • Child Celebrities

Submission Guidelines

All proposals must be submitted by email to admin@arcyp.ca by 11:59pm PST on October 12, 2018.

Individual Submissions

Please use the following format for the subject line of your email: “Proposal Last Name First Name” (e.g. Proposal Woodson Jacqueline). Please assist us by attaching a single document in .DOC, or .DOCX format only with the following information in exactly the order listed below:

  • Paper Title
  • Name; institutional affiliation; position or title; degrees and granting institutions; email address; and phone number
  • Full abstract of the content and rationale of the paper: up to 300 words. (Presentation time for papers is 20 minutes maximum)
  • Short abstract (150 words max)
  • Brief (2-3 sentence) scholarly biography of presenter
  • Indicate any audiovisual needs or special accommodations

Special-interest panel or roundtable/workshop proposals

We are open to proposals for special interest panels, roundtables, workshops, and other alternative formats. Please use the following format for the subject line of your email: “Special Panel/Roundtable Last Name First Name” (e.g. Special Panel/Roundtable Rowling J.K.). Please assist us by attaching a single document in .DOC, or .DOCX format only with the following information in exactly the order listed below:

  • Panel or roundtable (or alternative format/workshop) Title
  • Name; institutional affiliation; position or title; degrees and granting institutions; email address; and phone number
  • 1-2 sentences format explanation (time allotment or creative format breakdown as needed)
  • Abstract for panel/roundtable/workshop (150 words max)
  • Brief (2-3 sentence) scholarly biography for each participant including the organizer
  • Indicate any audiovisual needs or special accommodations

Please be in touch with any questions about workshops, roundtables, or any proposed panels distinct from the three paper panel format. Contact: naomi.hamer@ryerson.ca

ARCYP would like to acknowledge that this conference will be hosted at Ryerson University in the City of Toronto. Toronto is in the “Dish With One Spoon” Territory. The Dish With One Spoon is a treaty between the Anishinaabek and Haudenosaunee that bound them to share and protect the land in a spirit of peace, friendship and respect. Subsequent Indigenous Nations and many newcomers now live and work in the Dish and are obliged to honour these principles. As conference organizers and participants we will work to find ways to address and honour these principles.

CFP – Volume for Sociological Studies of Childhood and Youth: Bringing Children Back Into the Family

Document Icon

Call for papers
Bringing Children Back into the Family

We are looking for contributions for Volume 25 of the Sociological Studies of Childhood and Youth. This special edited collection will open a window into the lives of children’s experiences within the home. How have constructed understandings of the ‘family’ and of ‘parents’ impacted on children’s experiences? To what extent can valuing the voice of the child change our perspective of family life and the policies and practices that flow through it? These questions invite us to explore the structure-agency dialogue and to draw off theories embedded in the Sociology of Childhood in conjunction with ideas that originally emerged in Family Studies, as a means of re-presenting that ‘family space’ and the role of the individual child within it and as part of it.

Increasingly we are recognising the value of opening windows into those spaces where children experience their everyday lives. Theorists in the UK have offered a new perspective through which to understand the interrelationship of the individual within the structure of the family. It has highlighted themes such as display (Finch, 2007), personal lives (Smart, 2007) and family practices (Morgan, 2013) and generagency (Leonard, 2015). It is a desire to re-apply such thinking in the context of children’s lives in the family that sits behind this proposal. Traditional approaches to the institution of the family within social theory has been dominated by a one-dimensional interpretation of the role of the child, summed up by the child’s passivity in the face of adult direction. However, as McNamee and Seymour have noted, our growing awareness of children as social agents means that our ability to interpret family life can only be fully understood by ‘zooming out’ and recognising the wider web of family relations and interactions. They suggest that ‘what is needed now is to examine everyday life in the context of agency and structure and to bring children back in to the families [italics added] from which they were conceptually separated’ (2012: 103). Our ambition here would therefore be to present Sociological perspectives that allow us to explore how those play out in policy and practice. Through this, we aim to understand the multi-dimensional nature of children’s relationships within the home and the extent to which such experiences shape children’s meaning making and as a result how they come to both position themselves and consequently navigate home and the spaces beyond. To aid this endeavor, we will also be inviting practitioners and children to be part of this collection so that they can ‘speak’ to sociology.

This call invites scholars to be part of painting that picture of children’s everyday lives within the family. It will be necessary to acknowledge what frames the institution of the family, demanding insight from, for example, history, children’s geography, social policy, law and health care. Structure shapes practices, as such we wish to explore children’s experiences of rules and negotiation, generagency, opportunities to participate, and essential understandings around belonging. We are interested in how children ‘do’ and ‘display’ family. This invites consideration of the virtual world as well as the influence ‘home’ has on children in other everyday spaces. We, therefore, invite contributions that demonstrate how an increased awareness of children’s personal lives and the structure in which this is enacted offers a means to unpack that deeply relationally dominated world that is the family, with significant implications for policy, practice and children’s ongoing experiences.

This collection is being edited by Dr. Sam Frankel and Dr. Sally McNamee from King’s University College at Western University, Canada. Our interests reflect a range of theoretical and practice-based experience that we hope to encourage in a truly multidisciplinary response to this topic.

Please send 200 word abstract of your ideas to sfranke6@uwo.ca by 1 December 2018. Abstracts will be reviewed and authors invited to contribute a full chapter in the week of January 14. 6000-8000 word chapters to be submitted by 1 April 2019.

CFP – REIYL Conference: Transatlantic Conversations in Research on Inclusive Youth Literature

Document Icon

The REIYL Conference: Transatlantic Conversations in Research on Inclusive Youth Literature
8-10 August 2019
Scottish Youth Theatre, Glasgow

Confirmed Keynotes: Dr. Ebony Elizabeth Thomas, University of Pennsylvania, and Darren Chetty, University College of London

The idea for Researchers Exploring Inclusive Youth Literature (REIYL) began in January of 2018 when doctoral students Breanna McDaniel at the University of Cambridge and Josh Simpson at Strathclyde University began a conversation about justice and equity focused research on inclusive representation in children’s literature in the UK. From this came the idea of bringing together like-minded students and established academics dedicated to the study and analysis of current research, in the UK and abroad, to form a network through this first conference. We facilitate teaching and knowledge exchange with the hopes of building a more engaged and interconnected community, so that gains made in one space can reach other spaces in a timely and even manner. With these goals in mind, we are organising this conference to map the terrain of current research in our field.

We invite submissions for papers or presentations on inclusive youth literature publishing and scholarship with a particular focus on transatlantic conversations. While we are beginning with this focus, and are also open to critiques of this focus, we hope this will be the first of many conversations and collaborations. We seek abstracts for individual presentations and panels from graduate students and seasoned scholars, which both pose and respond to critical questions about:

  • Social media activism: #WeNeedDiverseBooks, #WeNeedDiverseScholars, #ReflectingRealities*
  • Youth literature texts and research in conversation across disciplines and borders
  • Youth literature outside of the “mainstream Western canon” and destabilizing the very concept of “mainstream” youth literature
  • Interdisciplinary engagement with youth literature and other forms of creative expression including theatre, filmmaking etc.
  • Intersections of identities in youth literature, i.e., (not exhaustive) indigeneity, race, gender, disability studies, immigration status, language, religion, sexuality, and class
  • Data collection on books featuring people and cultures that are typically marginalised and stereotyped
  • Critical engagement with foundational approaches to diversity in youth literature (for example, Bishop’s mirrors, windows, sliding glass doors)
  • New critical approaches to integrating critical race, disability, feminist, gender, religious, post-colonial, queer etc. theory in youth literature and the intersections of these theories

The proposed papers and panels should show how the contributor(s) will critically engage with the chosen topic. In other words, the proposal should do more than identify the current state of things (what might be called an “all-about” paper) and instead work toward a specific, arguable thesis and, where appropriate, include a specific case study.

We invite 250-word abstracts for 20-minute papers or panel proposals to be submitted by 1 January 2019. Details on how to submit abstracts, as well as further information on the conference, will be made available on a designated website soon.

For questions and concerns, please contact Breanna McDaniel or Joshua Simpson at questions@REIYL.com.

*We are particularly interested in developing urgent, critical conversations around the hashtag, study and ensuing studies occurring in the wake of the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education’s #ReflectingRealities report, which reveals that, of all the children’s books published in the UK in 2017, only 1% had a BAME main character and only 4% featured any BAME character(s) at all (2018, p. 5)